A Draw Is a Win: The Houthis After One Year of War

Abstract: The Iran-backed Houthi movement has delivered a strong military performance in the year of anti-Israel and anti-shipping warfare since October 2023. They seem to be aiming to be the ‘first in, last out,’ meaning the first to cross key thresholds during the war (for instance, attack Israel’s major cities) and the last to stop fighting (refusing to be deterred by Israeli or Anglo-American strikes inside Yemen). Facing weak domestic opposition and arguably strengthening their maritime line of supply to Iran, the Houthis are stronger, more technically proficient, and more prominent members of the Axis of Resistance than they were at the war’s outset. The Houthis can now exploit new opportunities by cooperating with other Axis of Resistance players in Iraq as well as with Russia, and they could offer Yemen as a platform from which Iran can deploy advanced weapons against Israel and the West without drawing direct retaliation.

In the year since the October 7, 2023, atrocities, Yemen’s Houthi movement^{1 a} is arguably (in the author’s view) the “Axis of Resistance”² member that has gained the most newfound recognition on the global stage. It was the Houthis who committed most quickly to support Hamas after October 7, including their dramatic October 31, 2023, launch of the first-ever medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) against Israel by a member of the Axis of Resistance, Iran included.³ Among the axis, only the Houthis—formally known as Ansar Allah (Partisans of God), and (since February 17, 2024) once again sanctioned by the United States for terrorism^b—have struck and sunk commercial ships in support of Hamas.⁴ After a year of notable setbacks for the axis—loss of terrain and leaders by Hamas,⁵ the deaths of Iranian and Iraqi commanders,⁶ an underwhelming Iranian strategic strike on Israel,⁷ heavy leadership losses for Hezbollah (including overall leader Hassan Nasrallah),⁸ and now Israeli ground incursions into Lebanon⁹—the Houthis have arguably weathered the year of war without suffering major setbacks.^c

This study aims to update the April 2024 study in CTC Sentinel,¹⁰ which looked in detail at the Houthi war effort against Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and global shipping from October 2023 to a data cut-off of April 11, 2024.¹¹ This article also builds on two other foundational CTC Sentinel pieces: the September 2018 analysis¹² of the military evolution of the movement and the October 2022 study (co-authored with Adnan Jabrani and Casey Coombs)¹³ that provided an in-depth profile of the Houthi p0litical-military leadership, its core motivations, and the considerable extent of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Lebanese Hezbollah influence within the movement.¹⁴

The sections below will take forward (to the time of writing (October 1, 2024, for news events, and an attack data cut-off of August 31, 2024)) the analysis of the military development of the Houthi movement. The analysis will draw on open-source reporting of Houthi military activities, which includes vast amounts of marine traffic analysis, social media, and broadcast media imagery, and U.S. and U.K. government announcements regarding military operations. The piece will also draw heavily on the collation and analysis work undertaken by Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s Maritime Spotlight platform,¹⁵ which maps and analyses Houthi attacks on shipping, and the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC), run by the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).¹⁶ Some data has been drawn from contacts in Western naval and intelligence services, and from contacts in Yemen with extensive on-the-ground access in Houthi-held areas.

The article starts by summarizing the trends visible in Houthi military activities in the second half of the post-October 7 period, from April to September 2024. With the broad outlines set, a detailed analysis follows. Houthi military performance will be dissected in terms of the operational tempo of Houthi attacks, the geographic reach demonstrated in Houthi strikes, and the evolution of Houthi tactics and preferred weapons systems. Special focus will be directed at the issue of why the Houthis strike the ships they do, with a view to better understanding the real level of intentionality (or otherwise) in Houthi targeting of specific vessels. The article will conclude with assessment of the impact of U.S.-led military operations to protect shipping and an update to the April 2024 CTC Sentinel assessment of the Houthi movement’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.¹⁷

Recent Trends in the Houthi War Effort
The overall trend in the Houthi war effort since the last CTC Sentinel analysis in April, and more broadly across the entire post-October 2024 period, has been the successful continuation and improvement of Houthi attacks on shipping and on Israel. Despite the commitment of significant U.S., European, and Indian naval forces, the Houthi anti-shipping campaign was not suspended at any point.^d Escalating U.S. and U.K. military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen also did not end the Houthi anti-shipping campaign or even significantly reduce its operational tempo.¹⁸ If anything, in the author’s view, the Houthis have arguably improved their effectiveness and efficiency as the war has progressed, by learning lessons and taking advantage of fluctuating U.S. aircraft carrier presence in the Red Sea. In the manner of an underdog boxer trying to ‘go the distance’ to the final bell,^e the Houthis have shown resilience and resisted a superpower’s effort to suppress their anti-shipping campaign. The Houthis also weathered a heavy Israeli retaliatory strike on one of their two main port complexes and continued to attack Israel. If, as the April 2024 CTC Sentinel article assessed,¹⁹ the Houthi aim is to vault to the front ranks of the Axis of Resistance by demonstrating fearlessness and pain tolerance in support of Hamas and in opposition to Israel and the U.S.-U.K. coalition,²⁰ then the Houthis have succeeded. From the perspective of Ansar Allah’s leaders, in this author’s view, the Houthis may see themselves as the main winners in the post-October 2023 conflict.

As the following sections will dissect in detail, the Houthis can claim to have maintained a broadly consistent operational tempo against shipping, with an apparent surge of effort in June and July 2024—precisely at the point that the U.S.-led international effort might have hoped the Houthi arsenals would be emptying and their pace of attacks reducing.^f In this author’s view, as the below sections will outline, the resilience of Houthi domestic drone and drone boat production has been demonstrated, as has the movement’s line of supply to Iran-provided experts and resupply of irreplaceable Iran-sourced materiel.²¹ As this article evidences below, many of the Houthi’s claims—of extended-range attacks in the eastern Indian Ocean or the Mediterranean—appear unfounded and perhaps deliberately falsified, but the Houthis have nonetheless spread growing fear that they can attack shipping beyond the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Houthi capacity to precisely identify, find, track, and strike ships by their owner’s nationality or ties to Israel may have been greatly overstated, but there are signs that the Houthis are gradually improving their targeting effort. In the author’s view (see “Tactical Evolution” below), the tactical sophistication of Houthi attacks is also steadily increasing from a very low initial base, aided by their ability to operate small boat flotillas in close proximity to the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden shipping lanes.

Updating the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) from the April 2024 CTC Sentinel article,²² it is sobering to note that assessed Houthi weaknesses—such as the technical deficiencies of their anti-shipping attacks and air defenses—may be less apparent now. Other exploitable Houthi weaknesses, such as their extended maritime line of supply to Iran and related smuggling networks, have not yet been effectively addressed by their adversaries. Regarding potential threats facing the Houthis, Iran has not been effectively levered into making the Houthis cease their attacks; nor has more united Yemeni opposition been aided to present a more urgent land warfare threat to the Houthis that might divert effort and attention from anti-shipping operations. As a result, in this author’s view, the Houthis can look back at the last year of war with satisfaction: Their position has strengthened, enemy countermeasures have been weathered, and they have no imminent threats on the horizon. This strongly suggests that the Houthis will sustain their anti-shipping and anti-Israel attacks as long as a Gaza and/or Lebanon war continues, if not beyond.

Operational Tempo and Geographic Reach
The Houthi military campaign has gone through some distinct stages since October 2023, often (but not always) reflected in the “phases” announced by Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi.^g The key trend has been a Houthi effort to sustain or increase their attacks on shipping and on Israel proper, despite obstacles such as U.S./U.K. airstrikes on launchers or the declining number of shippers using the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.^h The liberal Houthi claiming policy, which either accidentally or deliberately appears to claim attacks that have not happened,ⁱ hints at their desire to maximize the apparent tempo, reach, and impact of their attacks. With a strong historic focus on propaganda operations, causing the impression of attacks may be as useful to the Houthis as the number of real attacks itself.^j

Assessing how many attacks the Houthis have sent into the shipping lanes is an imprecise art because one must factor in both proven and strongly suspected completed attacks (evidenced by hits or near-misses on ships)²³ but also strongly suspected un-completed attacks (evidenced by the interception of inbound attacks by naval vessels in the shipping lanes).^k Most collators of attack metrics versus commercial ships (such as JMIC and Maritime Spotlight) count only completed attacks on commercial ships. By slotting together JMIC incident data and other shipping data (collated by Maritime Spotlight) with the intercept data, one can gain a fuller picture of how many attacks the Houthis actually launch.

Figure 1 includes the Maritime Spotlight-reported strikes on shipping,²⁴ fused with an additional set of intercepted attacks gathered in the author’s own dataset of U.S., U.K., and European-claimed interceptions in the shipping lanes.²⁵ Even then, these composite figures are probably a slight underreporting of actual strikes, as some attacks will be missed completely by collators,^l and some attacks are disrupted in the launch phase by U.S. strikes^m in Yemen but may be confused with strikes on storage sites where the weapons are not being readied for use against shipping at that moment.ⁿ

With these caveats noted, the below statistics tell a story of relative consistency in Houthi anti-shipping efforts, with an upward step-change of attacks in the summer of 2024.²⁶ What the chart clearly does not show is a steady decline in Houthi attack activity in the face of international countermeasures—even during periods of constant U.S. aircraft carrier presence in the Red Sea (November 4, 2023, to April 26, 2024, and May 6, 2024, to June 22, 2024).^o The percentage of completed attacks is 38 percent, averaged across the entire coverage period, with minimal variation across the period, suggesting a large proportion of intercepts (especially of slower-moving Houthi drones).²⁷

As well as wanting to be seen to sustain the tempo of their attacks, the Houthis also took pains to portray their geographic reach as ever-expanding. A new phase of claimed long-range strikes started in March 2024, with Houthi communiques threatening to strike out across the Indian Ocean basin as far south as the Cape of Good Hope off South Africa.²⁸ At the start of the Gaza war, there were two anti-shipping attacks on Israel-linked vessels in the eastern Indian Ocean: drone attacks on the CMA CGM Symi (November 24, 2023) and the Chem Pluto (December 23, 2024), both of which occurred closer to India than to Yemen and which may have employed Iranian naval and intelligence assets rather than Houthi ones.^p Closer to Yemen, the Houthis did undertake three attacks on vessels at the eastern and southern edges of the Gulf of Aden: one near Djibouti (MSC Orion, April 26, 2024), and two east of Socotra (MSC Sarah V of June 24, 2024, and Maersk Sentosa, July 9, 2024).²⁹ A rash of claimed attacks in the eastern Indian Ocean by the Houthis appear to be erroneous or deliberately falsified.^q A concatenation of these events put a chill on Indian Ocean shipping and resulted in some shipping lines taking longer mid-ocean routes to avoid the Yemeni and Horn of African littoral.³⁰ As has often been the case, an inflated perception of Houthi capability and aggressiveness may have achieved the effect the Houthis were seeking.

Houthi Direct Attacks on Israel
Houthi attacks against Israel itself were never numerous and have become rarer as the war has dragged on. Direct Houthi attacks on Israel were most numerous in November 2023, with five attacks in that month following the first-ever MRBM attack on Israel by an ‘Axis of Resistance’ member on October 31, 2024. Thereafter, Houthi-claimed direct attacks on Israel averaged just three per month in December 2023 to August 2024.^r

Of these Houthi-claimed direct attacks on Israel, a large proportion (10 of 27, or 37 percent) are claimed to have originated in Iraq,³¹ where the Houthis have had an increasingly visible presence as 2024 unfolded.³² The Houthis and the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI)³³ began to jointly claim attacks on Israel from June 6, 2024, onward.³⁴ The IRI is an online brand used since October 2023 to gather together and anonymize the claims of Iran-backed militants in Iraq as they attacked Israeli and U.S. targets, purportedly in connection to the Gaza war.³⁵ From June 6 to July 15, IRI and the Houthis (the latter using the moniker “Yemeni Armed Forces”) jointly claimed six long-range attacks on Israel-linked ships in Israeli Mediterranean coastal waters or harbors, plus four attacks on Israeli onshore port facilities in Eilat, Haifa, and Ashdod.³⁶ These attacks appear to be servicing Abdul Malik al-Houthi’s May 3 instruction to commence the fourth phase of the anti-shipping war in which any ships interacting with Israeli ports should be struck—not only those closest to the Houthis in Eilat but also those interacting with Israel’s Mediterranean ports.³⁷

As is the case with more than 169 drone and missile attacks on Israeli land targets solely claimed by the IRI (at the time of writing on September 24, 2024),³⁸ it is almost impossible to verify that these Houthi-IRI launches occurred,^s and it appears likely (based on multi-source analysis) that very few of the attacks reached Israel.^t As attacks on shipping are more likely to be reported (via systems like JMIC), it might be expected that more evidence would exist of the six Houthi-IRI-claimed long-range attacks on Israel-linked ships in Israeli Mediterranean coastal waters or harbors,^u yet these also cannot be confirmed.³⁹ An earlier set of three Houthi-claimed (i.e., without IRI) long-range strikes on Israel-linked ships in the eastern Mediterranean in the May 15-29, 2024, period also do not correspond with maritime security incident reporting, casting doubt on the fidelity of the claims.^v However, the June 30, 2024, killing of a mid-level Houthi officer (by a U.S. airstrike) at a drone or missile launch site in Iraq does lend additional credence to the claims of Houthi-IRI joint operations.⁴⁰

While Houthi attacks on Israel have been sporadic and ineffective, they have occasionally been spectacular. MRBM strikes were launched on Israel on June 3⁴¹ and July 21⁴² (both on Eilat), and September 17. The latter case was claimed by the Houthis as the first MRBM (out of seven efforts) to penetrate Israel’s Arrow and Iron Dome systems,⁴³ with either a whole missile or intercepted debris falling in an area 15 kilometers from Ben Gurion airport and 25 kilometers from Tel Aviv—wounding nine people in this civilian area,⁴⁴ which neither Iran nor Hezbollah has attacked since the Gaza war started.⁴⁵ Though the MRBM was claimed to be a new “hypersonic” design by the Houthis,⁴⁶ there has been no Israeli or Western admission of a hypersonic attack, and it was more likely an extended-range supersonic MRBM such as the Houthi Burkan-3/Zulfiqar.^w Since then, one more MRBM was fired by the Houthis at Israel (on September 27, 2024), again being intercepted.⁴⁷

A final notable Houthi strike on Israel was the July 19, 2024, drone attack on the center 0f Tel Aviv, which killed one Israeli civilian and injured at least four—once again, an action that neither Iran nor Hezbollah has dared to take since the outset of the Gaza war.⁴⁸ The drone, named Jaffa by the Houthis (the Arabic name for the Tel Aviv area) was an extended-range Iranian-made Sammad-3 drone.⁴⁹ The drone penetrated Israel’s battle-tested, low-level defenses by arriving from the west, over the Mediterranean coast, after apparently having taken a very long route via the African continent.⁵⁰ U.S. and Israeli officials speaking on condition of anonymity confirmed that it traveled via Eritrea, Sudan, and Egypt, thus avoiding the picket line of U.S. and European air defense vessels in the Suez area, and bypassing Israel’s own main south-facing defenses.⁵¹ While the tactical surprise generated by the intricate and well-planned flightpath will be difficult to replicate, the incident demonstrated the higher-end of Houthi technical capability, potentially utilizing Iranian or Hezbollah route planning assistance, in this author’s view. In finding a new—but fleeting—way to penetrate Israeli defenses, the July 19, 2024, drone attack on Tel Aviv is reminiscent of the March 19, 2024, cruise missile strike on Eilat,⁵² another ‘first’ where successful penetration was enabled by elaborate route planning, that time via central Iraq and Jordan airspace.⁵³

Israel’s powerful counterstrike to the Tel Aviv drone attack—Operation Outstretched Arm, the July 20, 2024, destruction of a significant portion of the Houthi oil storage infrastructure at Hodeida⁵⁴—was probably painful to the Houthis, as was the September 29, 2024, follow-on strike on Hodeida and Ras Issa ports.⁵⁵ However, these blows also (in the author’s view) brought the Houthis attention and recognition as the ‘Axis of Resistance’ member hitting Israel the hardest and in the most novel and spectacular ways.⁵⁶ The July 21 Houthi MRBM strike at Israel was one immediate response to the July 20, 2024, Hodeida strike,⁵⁷ and another was Abdul Malik al-Houthi’s statement the same day that the fifth phase of Houthi military operations in the current war would involve moving “to a new level of anti-Israel operations.”⁵⁸ He added that the “Yemeni people are pleased to be in direct confrontation with the Israeli enemy.”⁵⁹ A new September 27, 2024, MRBM strike on Israel drew a further September 29, 2024, Israeli strike on Hodeida and Ras Issa.⁶⁰

The Puzzle of Houthi Targeting Choices
Since November 2023, risk analysts, shipping companies, and insurers have all put a great deal of effort into understanding why the Houthis do or do not target vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.⁶¹ The Houthi clearly employ a kind of elective and selective targeting because only a tiny proportion of ships using the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden have been targeted. For example, there was still an average of 852 ships a month transiting the Bab el-Mandab in February to August 2024,⁶² the level at which the Red Sea reset after an initial drop from pre-war levels of over 2,100 ship transits each month.⁶³ Of these 850-odd transits,⁶⁴ the Houthis have, in the most intense month of attacks in June 2024, completed or attempted attacks on only 4.9 percent of ships.⁶⁵ That means 95.1 percent of ships transited the Red Sea without being attacked in that month,⁶⁶ underlining the manner in which the Houthis have a very large universe of potential targets to choose from, even when the Red Sea is less busy.

How do the Houthis choose their targets out of this mass of ships? Their main source of targeting guidance is the Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi, whose announced phases of the war have tended to focus on defining the categories of ships that may be legitimately targeted; the first phase (November 14 to December 9, 2023) included Israel-linked ships in the Red Sea;⁶⁷ then the second phase (December 9, 2023, to January 12, 2024) broadened to all ships headed to Israeli ports;⁶⁸ and the third phase (January 12 to May 3, 2024) included all U.S. and U.K. ships;⁶⁹ and the fourth phase (May 3, 2024, to the time of publication) added in any ships owned or operated by companies whose vessels service Israeli ports.⁷⁰

All of these categorizations require a degree of knowledge about the ownership, management, and vessel movement and port visits of commercial shipping. This data can be gained from open-source websites, but care and experience are required to differentiate between current and outdated information. As noted by Maritime Spotlight founding editor Noam Raydan, the Houthis appear to have started the war with knowledge about shipping lines and vessels that Iran had previously linked to Israeli owners and Israeli management—and which Iran had often targeted in the Persian Gulf in the 2019-2023 period.⁷¹ To this short list, the Houthis also added new research on shipping assets linked to Israel and then (after January 12, 2024) also ships linked to the United States and the United Kingdom.⁷² In the fourth phase of anti-shipping attacks undertaken since May 3, 2024, the Houthis will have needed to try to identify vessels not directly involved in Israeli trade but owned or managed by companies and individuals with apparent business in Israel or even personal connections to Israel.⁷³ The number of vessels tangentially linked to Israel, the United States, or the United Kingdom provides a very wide set of target options.

The broadening net of targets authorized by Abdul Malik al-Houthi has also included many Russian-linked and Chinese-linked vessels.^x These great powers should, in theory, be well-positioned to negotiate safe passage due to their geopolitical alignment with the anti-Western ‘Axis of Resistance,’^y yet they have both seen their cargos and vessels attacked repeatedly.^z One reason may be the sheer availability of such targets: As the U.S. Energy Information Administration noted, nearly 74 percent of the southbound Red Sea oil traffic in the first half of 2023,⁷⁴ just before the war started, was made up of Russian oil cargos carried by the so-called “dark fleet,” often headed to East Asia.⁷⁵ As LNG tankers and major global shipping lines abandoned the lower Red Sea early in the conflict,⁷⁶ an even higher proportion of the remaining Red Sea transits was presumably (in the author’s view) made up by these smaller, cost-conscious, and risk-acceptant shippers willing to risk the journey. These same shippers have often, in the past, brought Russian oil to Israel, and are therefore perfectly valid targets from a Houthi perspective.⁷⁷

JMIC statistics suggest that 14 percent of ships attacked by the Houthis from November 19, 2023, to August 31, 2024, were targeted because outdated ownership data triggered the extant Houthi targeting criteria.⁷⁸ In some cases vessels carrying Russian oil, notably Andromeda Star, have also been misidentified with consulted outdated materials as British-owned and attacked.^aa In other cases, Chinese-owned vessels such as the Pumba have been attacked after being identified as U.K.-owned by outdated ownership intelligence.^ab

Can the Houthis Maintain a Target Lock?
If one problem is incorrect characterization of whether a ship meets the targeting criteria, a parallel problem is whether the Houthis have a sufficiently good ability to differentiate and track targets during an attack. If they do not, then it is very possible (in the author’s view) that they may undertake attacks on a certain ship but end up striking a different one. Quite a lot of evidence supports this theory. First, JMIC statistics suggest that as high as 37 percent of ships attacked by the Houthis from November 19, 2023, to August 31, 2024, did not meet the Houthis’ own extant targeting criteria.⁷⁹ Second, the Houthis have struck Iranian ships^ac and vessels that had recently left Houthi ports,^ad or which were visiting Houthi ports,^ae all categories of vessel that would presumably have a lower risk of being intentionally targeted.

Third, the Houthis have frequently appeared confused about which ships they struck:^af for instance, claiming hits on multiple ships on July 11, 2024, with no apparent knowledge of the presence of the only actual ship struck (the Russian oil-bearing Rostrom Stoic), or the unwitting Houthi targeting of a Saudi tanker, Amjad, on September 2, 2024, which the Houthis mistook for the Russian oil-bearing Blue Lagoon 1.⁸⁰ Fourth, the Houthis have sometimes claimed to hit ships that are not physically present in the targeted waterway: For instance, the May 7, 2024, claim to have targeted the MSC Michela in the Red Sea when the ship (and indeed all MSC vessels) are no longer using the Red Sea, and the Michela was instead in the Atlantic Ocean.⁸¹

To understand how the Houthis “find, fix and finish”^ag a ship, once they think they have identified a legitimate target, it is important to look at the sensors available to them. Wide-area surveillance giving a ‘common operational picture’ of what vessels are visiting the Red Sea is mostly provided by ship-based transponders, the Automatic Identification System (AIS).⁸² This system—available in simple form via non-subscription websites and in fuller form via subscription services—accurately maps all vessels in a maritime space with a velocity vector (indicating speed and heading), ship name, classification, call sign, registration numbers, and other information.⁸³ To reduce the risk of AIS being used to predict the location of a vessel (say, in the three to five minutes flight time of an Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) at 300 kilometers distance),⁸⁴ the UK Maritime Trade Organization advised from June 13 onward that vessels weigh the navigational and collision risks of turning their AIS off in high-threats areas of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, and consider turning their AIS off when under attack and altering course in order to prevent their targeting by dead reckoning (i.e., projecting their future location due to their bearing and speed).⁸⁵

AIS is likely not the only source of targeting information used by the Houthis, not least as the JMIC data shows that 13 percent of attacks have successfully struck a ship even when AIS was turned off. There are indications that long-range electronic intelligence (ELINT) is used by the Houthis to track ships, even those with their AIS transponders switched off. For example, JMIC guidance stresses the need to reduce “non-essential emissions: other than AIS such as ‘intraship UHF/VHF transmissions.’”⁸⁶ U.S. and U.K. naval officers privately confirm that the Houthis do listen in to bridge-to-bridge communications.⁸⁷ The United States and the United Kingdom seem to have tried to reduce Houthi ELINT capabilities: As noted in the April 2024 CTC Sentinel article,⁸⁸ the United States undertook multiple sequences of airstrikes in 2023 and 2024 on retransmission towers and GSM cell towers on high ground overlooking the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.⁸⁹ Cellphone emissions close to shore may also be vulnerable to direction-finding,⁹⁰ not least because the Houthis control the key Yemeni telecommunications service providers, who are based in Sanaa.⁹¹ It is also possible the Houthis have found ways to subscribe to commercial services that can triangulate terrestrial radio and combine it with AIS tracking. The Houthis are known to have received so-called Virtual Radar Receivers from Iran⁹² that can create a targeting solution for aerial targets by fusing together open-source transponder and radio detection services.^{93 ah} In the author’s view, the Houthis have probably already (with Iranian help) developed similar systems to combine vessel monitoring and radio direction-finding data.

In a final addition to this sensor network, the Houthis also probably utilize close-in sensors, such as surveillance UAVs, ship-borne AIS and radio monitoring, and visual scanning from boats.⁹⁴ At the outset of the conflict, the Houthis appear to have received radar and electronic intelligence steers from Iranian vessels⁹⁵ (such as Iranian frigates purportedly undertaking counter-piracy patrols,^ai or various Iranian spy ships before they left the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by mid-April 2024).^aj More recently, Houthi small boat flotillas have made and sustained contact with targeted vessels, flying small UAVs near them⁹⁶ and maintaining a visual link in order to provide updated location information to long-range strike systems (like ASBMs) and to observe and correct the fall-of-shot.⁹⁷

By achieving closer shadowing of target vessels (see “Tactical Evolution” below), the Houthis appear to be reducing the time-in-flight limitation of their long-range strike systems (which can exceed 100 minutes for a drone flying 300 kilometers, during which time a ship can move by as much as 75 kilometers).⁹⁸ Houthi missiles and drones may carry terminal guidance systems—certainly semi-active radar homing for anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs),⁹⁹ also electro-optical cameras in UAVs,¹⁰⁰ and possibly (though this is unconfirmed) some form of guidance system in some ASBMs as well.¹⁰¹ The combination of wide-area surveillance, close-in target shadowing, and terminal guidance has allowed the Houthis to achieve some impressive feats of marksmanship, such as an apparent near-miss on a U.S. aircraft carrier^ak and a number of hits or very close misses by ASBMs on ships approximately 150-200 kilometers from launch points.^al

Tactical Evolution
The prior April 2024 CTC Sentinel study on the Houthi war effort in October 2023 to April 2024 provided an in-depth review of Houthi anti-shipping weapons—the Mohit and Asef ASBMs, the Al-Mandab-2 anti-ship cruise missile, a variety of fixed and delta-wing explosive-carrying UAVs, plus explosive drone boats (unmanned surface vehicles, or USVs).¹⁰² This study will not repeat the lengthy profiles of these weapons and how they have been employed by the Houthis, only insofar as their mode of employment has changed significantly since then. The April 2024 study anticipated a gradual depletion of higher-end systems like ASBMs, but this did not manifest.¹⁰³ The following chart (Figure 2) shows numbers of projectiles detected by the author as having been employed by the Houthis in anti-shipping attacks since the end of April 2024.¹⁰⁴ Like all attack data, this is an imprecise art and is only meant to be indicative of the number of missiles,^am UAVs, and USVs reported by coalition forces as intercepted during attacks, or reported by shippers impacting near or on vessels in proven attacks. Trends include the rise in attacks by explosive drone boats (USVs) in the summer; a more even spread of attack types; and a consistent drumbeat of UAV attacks, probably reflecting the relative ease of producing such systems inside Yemen.¹⁰⁵

In qualitative terms, the main change in Houthi anti-shipping attacks was the continual refinement of tactics regarding the combination of weapons systems. Three stages of development can be observed; in each case, the tactics were first applied in the Red Sea and then were extended to the Gulf of Aden.¹⁰⁶ The stages overlap and are not exclusive—in many cases, the Houthis mixed and matched older and newer tactics—but they do seem to have unfolded as a progression to more complex operations.¹⁰⁷

Single-system stand-off. After a brief period of failing to replicate the seizure of the Galaxy Leader, the Houthis commenced stand-off attacks in December 2023 to late May 2024, largely using either UAVs or ASBMs or cruise missiles but not a mix.¹⁰⁸ Accurate ASBM shots became regular in the Red Sea toward the end of June 2024 and continued through mid-July.^an They extended into the Gulf of Aden slightly later.^ao

Multi-system stand-off. The Houthis appear to have begun mixing UAVs and ASBMs or other missiles in series of attacks on single vessels in the Red Sea from the end of May and into early June.^ap This period witnessed torturous chases in which individual vessels were bombarded with missile and drone attacks that followed them for many hours,^aq in one case throughout the ship’s transit from the Gulf of Aden all the way to the central Red Sea.^ar This kind of action gave a sense of the targets being tracked effectively and periodically targeted in a kind of ‘pursuit by fire.’

All-systems, close-up, and stand-off. The third stage of development also overlapped the first two, manifesting first in the Red Sea, and was characterized by much greater involvement of Houthi small boat flotillas, typically including at least one USV.¹⁰⁹ These ‘hunter-killer’ packs first targeted the bulk carrier Tutor in the Red Sea on June 12, causing the vessel to sink on June 18, only the second ship to be sunk (at the time of publication) by the Houthis.¹¹⁰ The Tutor attack was notable for a successful “tail-chase” by at least one explosive drone boat that crippled the vessel,^{111 as} followed by subsequent attacks on the stranded and abandoned vessel that may have included UAVs, ASBMs, and possibly demolition charges placed by Houthis on small boats.^at Such wolf pack tactics—slowing or stopping the target, then maintaining contact with a wounded vessel and continuing to attack—was then replicated (albeit without new sinkings) in the Red Sea^au and later also the Gulf of Aden.^av A clear example of this tactics was the attack on the Sounion between August 21-23, when a determined wolf pack raked the vessel with close-in medium weapons fire^aw from small craft and detonated at least one USV or missile near enough the ship to cause it to lose power.¹¹² While evacuating the crew, a coalition naval vessel destroyed another nearby USV. Days later, while adrift and unguarded, the Sounion was boarded by Houthi commandos who set barrels of explosive on the deck and detonated them in a vivid videoed propaganda attack that demonstrated almost complete Houthi freedom of action.¹¹³

As the author’s April 2024 CTC Sentinel article noted, the Houthis were extensively drilling their fast attack boat and USV flotilla between early August 2023 and the outset of the Gaza war in October,¹¹⁴ probably related to rising U.S.-Iran naval tensions in the Arabian Gulf, where Iran had made six attacks on Israeli or U.S.-linked vessels between February and July 2023.^ax In a sense, the Houthi anti-shipping campaign has returned to its roots—albeit now with ASBMs and other weapons incorporated into the attacks of these wolf packs.¹¹⁵ Houthi naval commander Brigadier General Mansour al-Saadi had boasted in mid-December that around 80 such USVs had been stockpiled,¹¹⁶ and this author’s April 2024 report noted that very few of these had been used at that time, but many have been subsequently employed in June-August 2024.¹¹⁷ The Houthi flotilla utilizes fishing boats, islands, and even foreign coastlines (in Sudan, Eritrea, and Somalia) as sustainment hubs,¹¹⁸ exploiting restrictive coalition rules of engagement to merge within civilian traffic.¹¹⁹ The Houthi flotilla has employed tactical drones, electronic intelligence-gathering equipment, and AIS trackers to shadow and report on target ships,¹²⁰ with periodic reports of them approaching or hailing vessels to confirm their identity.¹²¹ Houthi flotilla are very rarely attacked and do not appear to suffer communication problems with the mainland.¹²² This would seem (in the author’s view) to be from the Houthi perspective an ideal combination of forward observation and close-in attack options, backed-up by long-range strike capabilities that can now be assured of updated information on ship locations.

The Balance Sheet Between the Houthi and U.S. Efforts
Operations Prosperity Guardian (the U.S.-led escort and interception effort),¹²³ Aspides (the E.U. equivalent),¹²⁴ and Poseidon Archer (U.S.-U.K. airstrikes inside Houthi-held Yemen)¹²⁵ have been marked by undoubted feats of valor, endurance, and professionalism. For U.S., U.K., and E.U. naval forces, these operations arguably (in the view of the author) represent the most intense maritime trial-by-fire since conflicts like the Iran-Iraq War and the Falklands.^ay Operating for extended periods in an unforgiving, high-threat engagement zone, the U.S. and partner navies have been fortunate not to have suffered a serious missile impact so far, and there have been near-misses.^az (As recently as September 27, Houthis forces appear to have fired a salvo of cruise missiles and drones at or near a cluster of U.S. military vessels, albeit with all the unspecified number of munitions being intercepted.¹²⁶) The Houthis (and the broader Axis of Resistance) might achieve a significant propaganda boon if a U.S. vessel were badly damaged or sunk, and even the withdrawal of a U.S. carrier battle group from the Red Sea was loudly trumpeted by the Houthis as a victory. In the sphere of air defense, the Houthis have not come close to threatening U.S.-manned aircraft, but they have taken a heavy toll on the U.S. drone fleet, destroying at least nine MQ-9 Reapers between November 8, 2023, and October 1, 2024.^ba

The United States and partner forces in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden have clearly reduced the damage that the Houthis could do to global shipping, as evidenced by an assessed 62 percent interception rate shown in Figure 1 of this study. In addition to interception of launched attacks, the U.S.-U.K. air campaign over Yemen has undoubtedly limited Houthi capabilities to find and fix commercial ships—for instance, a determined effort to blind the Houthi targeting system with intensified strikes on Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) in June 2024.^bb

However, the reduction of U.S. naval presence in the Red Sea, particularly the withdrawal of the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Eisenhower in late June, has arguably opened up the space needed for the Houthis to redeploy their small boat flotillas and recommence more effective wolf pack tactics.¹²⁷ Of note, naval assets do not appear to have been sufficient to guard the Tutor and the Sounion after they lost power and were abandoned,¹²⁸ allowing the Houthis to access these stricken ships. Houthi attack patterns in June and July appeared to show greater freedom of movement for their small boat and USV flotillas and an enhanced ability to follow and repeatedly attack ships.¹²⁹ In sum, in the view of the author, freedom of safe navigation has clearly not been restored by the efforts of international navies, respectable shippers have not been assured, and Houthi attacks are not deterred.

Equally concerning, one of the greatest exploitable weaknesses of the Houthis—significant reliance on a maritime line of supply to Iran, for military resupply and for financing—has not been addressed by the international naval presence in the Red Sea. Whatever military supplies cannot be made entirely locally in Yemen—notably missile guidance, engines, fuel, warheads, and C4ISR systems¹³⁰—has to be squeezed through the Houthi Red Sea ports or smuggled overland through enemy territory controlled by Yemen’s internationally recognized government. Yet, the policing of the U.N. embargo on arms deliveries to the Houthis seems to have slackened during the current conflict, not tightened, in the author’s view. At least six large ships have visited the Houthi-held port of Hodeida in 2024 without stopping for inspection, as required by a U.N. Security Council resolution, at the UN Verification and Inspection Mechanism (UNVIM) hub at Djibouti.¹³¹ This is unusual behavior that only started in the spring of 2024 when the war was underway.^bc On May 13, 2024, the U.K. representative to the United Nations, Barbara Woodward, revealed that as many as 500 truckloads of material were known to have bypassed inspections by this method.¹³² Alongside the risk of large ship transfers, which are legally difficult to interdict as they require flag-state permission to board,¹³³ there have also been a trickle of large dhows and fishing boats entering the Houthi-held inlets south and north of Hodeida (which were detailed in the April 2024 article),¹³⁴ with around 12 ships subsequently docking there in May-August 2024, according to the author’s local contacts.¹³⁵ On June 26-27, 2024, the Houthis also managed to overcome the aerial embargo by diverting a Yemenia flight to Amman so that it instead landed in Beirut, Lebanon, and returned from there to Sanaa, Yemen.¹³⁶ What all this points to is the likelihood that the Houthis have been able to sustain their operational tempo—despite increased expenditure of munitions and U.S.-U.K. strikes—because they are being resupplied at an adequate rate.

Updating the SWOT Analysis of the Houthi War Effort
The April 2024 CTC Sentinel study issued an assessment of the demonstrated strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing the Houthis in the first period of their war against Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom, and global shipping. As the war turns one year old, the picture is arguably even bleaker for the forces trying to contain the Houthi threat.

The strengths shown by the Houthis are abundant and have been reinforced by events: Their pain tolerance was illustrated by their apparent insensitivity to having at least a third of their oil storage facilities destroyed by Israel on July 20, which they answered immediately by firing a ballistic missile at Israel and vowing to double their efforts to strike the Israeli state. The strategic depth of Yemen—its size and mountainous terrain—had complicated the task of finding and destroying Houthi missile and drone systems.^bd The weak and divided state of the anti-Houthi opposition on the Arabian Peninsula was graphically underlined when a promising Yemeni government economic warfare effort from late May 2024 began to destabilize the Houthi banking system,¹³⁷ only to have the effort curtailed just days after the Houthi July 7 threat to recommence their missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia.¹³⁸

Some weaknesses identified in April 2024 appear to have been partially addressed by the Houthis. One senior U.S. naval officer with responsibility for the Yemen theater told the author in mid-2024, “We came to see that the Houthis are not a ragtag force: they are resourced, trained, funded, stocked, supplied, and resupplied.”¹³⁹ As noted, the Houthi line of supply to Iran has probably strengthened, with no apparent cost for bypassing a U.N. inspection regime.¹⁴⁰ As outlined above, Houthi air defenses are gradually strengthening, albeit only against drones, and the technical weakness of long-range target acquisition and tracking are arguably being mitigated with new wolf pack flotilla tactics. As one U.K. naval officer with experience of the Red Sea operations told the author: “Iran has excellent marine traffic intelligence; the Houthis don’t.”¹⁴¹ Yet, there is some evidence to suggest that the Houthis have learned how to offset this weakness and track intended targets.¹⁴² As this author noted previously, the Houthis could not operate in proximity to strong Western naval forces in the Red Sea, but the thinning out of these forces offsets the Houthi weakness in tactical proficiency. The economic weakness of the Houthi regime was briefly exploited by the Yemeni government before being abruptly turned off by Yemen’s backers—Saudi Arabia, the United Nations, and the United States.

Major opportunities now beckon for the Houthis and the ‘Axis of Resistance,’ with the Houthis arguably having delivered the best military performance of all the axis players in the current war, in the author’s view. There is strong potential for the Houthis to build on their successes in severely constricting one of the world’s busiest global chokepoints, the Bab el-Mandab. International shippers, insurers, and governments must be careful to ensure the Houthis do not learn how to effectively monetize their ability to shut the Bab el-Mandab and Suez Canal to selected nations or shipping companies, which can be levered into a lucrative extortion racket.¹⁴³ As Houthi targeting capability gets more selective, this terrorist threat finance risk may rise, unless it is actively monitored and deterred through sanctions enforcement.^be The caution shown toward the Houthis by international players such as Saudi Arabia^bf could make them more aggressive, and this tendency may deepen as the Houthis learn to threaten their way out of tight spots—for instance, using threats of infrastructure attacks to extort political concessions in peace talks^bg or, as was tried recently, to coerce the Yemeni government to provide oil revenues to the Houthis.^bh

The Houthis’ elevation to a top-tier member of the ‘Axis of Resistance’ presents other opportunities to the whole Iran-led bloc. Under the Houthis, Yemen has become a place from which the Iran threat network can undertake attacks on Israel that Iran itself does not dare to mount—already including ballistic missile and drone attacks on Tel Aviv.¹⁴⁴ Yemen might also be used by the axis as a way to mount attacks on other targets—such as U.S. forces—in a way that may not draw retaliation on more pain-sensitive parts of the axis—for instance, Iran. At present, the Houthis have used the boogey-man reputation of hypersonic weapons as an attention-grabber, but in the future, Yemen could be an ideal site for such weapons considering its geographic placement and its proven ability to conceal launch sites in its rugged interior.

Likewise, the expansion of Houthi presence into areas like Iraq—where a senior Houthi missileer was killed by a U.S. strike on June 30, 2024—could put Houthi strike capabilities in new areas such as Saudi Arabia’s northern border,^bi the Iraq-Jordanian border,^bj and Syria.¹⁴⁵ Where Iran and its local partners can sometimes be fearful of the consequences of striking foes such as Israel or the United States, the Houthis may be more willing. This is particularly the case as key Iranian partners like Hamas and increasingly Hezbollah face severe military pressure from Israel. It is intriguing that a more visible Houthi presence in Iraq¹⁴⁶ seemed to coincide with the first use by Iraqi groups (under the IRI umbrella) of what the Houthis call the Quds-type land attack cruise missiles (LACM), known in Iran as the 351/Paveh.^bk In the author’s view, it is worth investigating whether this capability entered Iraq for the first time precisely because Houthis were on-hand to help Iraqi militias open this new front using unprecedentedly advanced weapons.

The Houthi attacks in the southern Gulf of Aden—south of Socotra and toward Djibouti—hint at what expeditionary Houthi boat flotillas might accomplish one day, off the African littoral and even operating on the eastern coast of Africa in weak state environments like Sudan, al-Shabaab enclaves, and Somalia.^bl The Gaza war has shown that the Houthi need to undertake very few real attacks in the Indian Ocean to send a shiver through the global shipping networks. Imagine what a more effective capability could do, in the manner of the German merchant raiders that haunted the Indian Ocean in both world wars.¹⁴⁷ Addressing this threat more effectively will very likely be a priority issue for U.S. policymakers in the future, and one that the intelligence community will be called upon to support with analysis.

The Houthis could also view Russian military support as an opportunity. In a recent on-the-record address in Washington, D.C., the U.S. envoy to Yemen, Tim Lenderking, was explicit about the risks of Russo-Houthi partnership, noting: “Their relationship with Russia is extremely troubling … Russia is irritated by our strong policy on Ukraine, and they are seeking other outlets to retaliate, including in Yemen. They have been seeking to arm the Houthis, which would be a game-changer.”¹⁴⁸ Lenderking was reflecting widespread press reporting of a potential Iran-brokered Russian supply of Yakhont/P-800 Onik anti-ship cruise missiles to the Houthis, which U.S. comments were probably intended to dissuade.¹⁴⁹

Perhaps the only sharp threat facing the Houthis is the possibility that the Axis of Resistance writ large could suffer a crippling number of defeats in the current war—in Gaza, Lebanon, and elsewhere—and that Iranian and Lebanese Hezbollah support to the Houthis might not be as available in the future as it has been in the past. For instance, Hassan Nasrallah’s death¹⁵⁰ removes one of the most ardent supporters in Lebanon of the Houthi cause, potentially disrupting a key relationship and potentially focusing Hezbollah on its own internal problems. Indeed, one wonders if the abundant manpower of the Houthis could provide a source of outsider regime security forces willing to crack down on local populations where Iran-backed groups are feeling pressure—such as Lebanon, Syria, and even Iraq or Iran.^bm

This underlines the unusual potential finding that Iran itself may be more vulnerable than the Houthis. As U.S. Central Command’s General Erik Kurilla told Congress on March 7, 2024, the key to suppressing Iranian partner forces like the Houthis may come in the form of pressuring Iran itself to force the axis to back down¹⁵¹—a kind of inside-out approach in which Iran uses its soft power, its ideological leadership role within the axis, to convince a Houthi ceasefire (probably temporary) in the shipping lanes. If this turns out to be true, this would suggest that it may be easier to try to threaten “the head of the octopus”¹⁵² (Iran) than to try to directly coerce its newest and most resilient and aggressive tentacle.     CTC

Dr. Michael Knights is the Jill and Jay Bernstein Fellow with the Military and Security Program at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He has traveled extensively in Yemen since 2006. X: @mikeknightsiraq

© 2024 Michael Knights

Substantive Notes
[a] Salmoni, Loidolt, and Wells note that the Houthis are known by a variety of names: “the ‘Houthis’ (al-Houthiyin), the ‘Houthi movement’ (al-Haraka al-Houthiya), ‘Houthist elements’ (al-‘anasir al-Houthiya), ‘Houthi supporters’ (Ansar al-Houthi), or ‘Believing Youth Elements’ (‘Anasir al-Shabab al-Mu’min).”

[b] On January 19, 2021, the outgoing Trump administration designated the Houthi organizational institution Ansar Allah as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO), a step that the Biden administration almost immediately revoked on February 16, 2021. Since then, some Houthi leaders remained covered by older sanctions (and additional Houthi military leaders continue to be added to U.S. sanctions lists) for posing a “threat to the peace, security, or stability of Yemen.” Then on January 17, 2024, the Biden administration redesignated the Houthis as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) entity but not as an FTO, a difference that enables easier access for humanitarian organizations and peace negotiators when the designation went into effect on February 17, 2024. For the newest SDGT designation, see “Terrorist Designation of the Houthis: Press Statement by Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State,” U.S. Department of State, January 17, 2024. For the prior sanctions, see “Revocation of the Terrorist Designations of Ansarallah,” U.S. Department of State, February 12, 2021. The U.S. government noted: “Ansarallah leaders Abdul Malik al-Houthi, Abd al-Khaliq Badr al-Din al-Houthi, and Abdullah Yahya al-Hakim remain sanctioned under E.O. 13611 related to acts that threaten the peace, security, or stability of Yemen.” See also “Treasury Sanctions Key Military Leaders of the Ansarallah Militia in Yemen,” U.S. Department of the Treasury, March 2, 2021; “Treasury Sanctions Senior Houthi Military Official Overseeing Group’s Offensive Operations,” U.S. Department of the Treasury, May 20, 2021; and “Treasury Targets Key Houthi Finance Network in Coordination with Regional Gulf Partners,” U.S. Department of the Treasury, February 23, 2022.

[c] One might look at the Israel July 20 attack on Houthi port facilities or the January 17, 2024, designation of the Houthis as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) entity as setbacks, but neither effort changed the Houthi behavior and the Houthis appear to have lost no senior leaders and no terrain since the war began, nor have they been notably economically damaged and the Houthi currency remains more stable than that of the internationally recognized government of Yemen. See “The Economy,” Yemen Review, April-June 2024.

[d] There were two short pauses in Houthi anti-shipping attacks in 2024—April 9-24 and August 15-20—that are unexplained, though it is notable that these pauses coincided closely with periods of intense rain and flooding in Yemen, which tends to disrupt all military and non-military activities.

[e] It is hard not to think of the movie boxer “Rocky” when looking at the fighting characteristics of the Houthis. Though this is charitable in the extreme—and does not reflect a sympathy for the Houthis—it is useful to view the Houthis in the Gaza war as an underdog boxer taking on much stronger opponents, whose aim may simply be to “go the distance” by supporting Hamas and the axis of resistance until the war ends (until the bell rings). Endurance and dogged pain aversion can be said to be characteristics of both the Houthis and the apocryphal Rocky Balboa.

[f] This was the hope contained in this author’s assessment in his April 2024 CTC Sentinel article, which envisaged a triadic mechanism—increased usage and destruction of Houthi systems, compounded by tightened interdiction—slimming down Houthi arsenals.

[g] The first phase, announced on November 14, 2023, called for attacks on Israeli ships in the Red Sea and on Israel proper. See Mohammed al-Harissi, “Yemen’s Houthis vow to attack Israeli ships in Red Sea,” National, November 14, 2023. The second phase, announced on December 9, 2023, declared Houthi intent to attack all ships headed to Israeli ports via the Red Sea. The third phase, announced after U.S./U.K. strikes on the Houthis on January 12, 2024, called for strikes on all U.S.- and U.K.-linked ships as well. Abdul Malik’s fourth phase was announced on May 3, 2024, broadened targeting to all ships whose owners or operators have visited Israeli ports. A fifth phase announced by Abdul Malik on July 21 was unclear in its expanded aims but seemed to focus more effort on Israel proper and its Mediterranean traffic and ports.

[h] Lloyd’s List traffic metrics suggest volume of shipping in the Red Sea dropped by 46 percent between November 2023 and February 2024, and has remained at these low levels since. Lloyd’s List traffic metrics similarly suggest Bab el-Mandab transits dropped by 57 percent in the same comparison and stayed at this lower level since February 2024. Maritime Spotlight data; Lloyd’s List Intelligence presentation, August 9, 2024, provided to the author.

[i] This study lists a number of cases in which Houthi attack claims do not appear to have been correct, notably attacks on the Mediterranean shipping and Indian Ocean vessels. Some examples cited include claimed but apparent false or at least erroneous attacks (all in 2024) on the Veracruz (April 24), MSC Vittoria 1 (May 7), Destiny (May 15), the Essex (May 23), MSC Alexandra (May 23), Minerva Antonia (May 29), Aloraiq (June 1), and Anvil Point (July 1). All the maritime attack case studies in this article draw upon the very useful Washington Institute Maritime Spotlight online tracker by Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi.

[j] In the author’s long study of the Houthi movement since the 2000s, a recurring feature is their keen eye for propaganda operations, about which the following listed authors dedicated entire chapters in their 2010 study. See Barak Salmoni, Bryce Loidolt, and Madeleine Wells, Regime and Periphery in Northern Yemen: The Houthi Phenomenon (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010).

[k] Operation Prosperity Guardian (OPG) also reports the interception of incoming attacks that are not counted by JMIC incident reporting. JMIC incidents are reported by shippers, who are not themselves witness to interceptions far away from their vessels. To give an example of the OPG intercept data, on September 24, 2024, a tweet released by @CENTCOM noted that “U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) forces successfully destroyed one Iranian-backed Houthi uncrewed aerial vehicle over the Red Sea.” See U.S. Central Command, “Sept 24 U.S. Central Command Update: In the past 24 hours, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) forces successfully destroyed …,” X, September 24, 2024.

[l] If JMIC and thus Maritime Spotlight are reliant on self-reporting of attacks by shippers, it stands to reason that some attacks will be simply not detected (neither intercepted nor landing close enough to a vessel to be noticed) or simply not revealed for some reason (perhaps insurance-related).

[m] The United Kingdom takes part in Poseidon Archer planned joint strikes with the United States in Yemen, but it does not appear to mount preemptive ‘dynamic’ (opportunistic) strikes on launchers ashore, which are all undertaken by the United States.

[n] It is hard to tell sometimes whether a reported strike on a “missile launcher” is a preemptive U.S. action (as a missile is readied for launch, arguably counting as an ‘attack’) or a strike on a storage site that cannot be considered an attack by Houthi forces. In the data collation in this piece, all such marginal or inconclusive cases are not counted as an attack.

[o] Interestingly, the chart does appear to show a rise in Houthi attacks after the end of the extended presence of the USS Eisenhower and supporting escort vessels in the Red Sea from November 4, 2023, to April 26, 2024. The Eisenhower returned to the Red Sea for a very intense period of Houthi attacks between May 6, 2024, and June 22, 2024, and there was no apparent downturn in attacks in that period. Since June 22, as later sections will detail (see “Tactical Evolution”), the Houthis seem to have exploited the reduction of U.S. presence. See “IKE Carrier Strike Group Arrives in Middle East Region,” U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs, November 4, 2023; Bernat Armangue and Tara Copp, “On the USS Eisenhower, 4 months of combat at sea facing Houthi missiles and a new sea threat,” Associated Press, February 15, 2024; Mallory Shelbourne, “Carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Back in Red Sea, Passes 200-Day Deployment Mark,” USNI News, May 6, 2024; and “IKE Carrier Strike Group Arrives in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea,” U.S. Navy, June 24, 2024.

[p] On November 25, 2023, the Houthis claimed to strike an Israeli-linked container ship, CMA CGM Symi, in the Indian Ocean using a one-way attack drone, over 2,200 kilometers from the nearest Houthi-controlled area in Yemen. Considering the range, targeting support from Iran (in the form of the Safiz surveillance ship off the coast of India) is considered likely in this case. Details gathered from interviews with U.S. and U.K. military personnel for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[q] These include claimed attacks (all in 2024) on the Veracruz (April 24), MSC Vittoria 1 (May 7), MSC Alexandra (May 23), Aloraiq (June 1), and Anvil Point (July 1). Maritime Spotlight data.

[r] This includes all Houthi-claimed attacks launched either from Yemen or Iraq, which are likely to be comprehensive as the Houthis have a strong incentive to seek credit for such attacks. These Houthi-claimed attacks do not always result in confirmation of the attacks by Israel, particularly not when they are launched from Iraq. Author’s security incident dataset.

[s] The attack claims by IRI (including joint claims with the Houthis) often include videos of launches. The videos are not duplicated, being original each time, which is one indicator that attacks are genuinely being launched, but the lack of any supporting data means that it is still unclear whether all claimed attacks occur.

[t] Very few Israeli press or government communiques give any insight into whether such IRI or IRI/Houthi-claimed projectiles reach Israel.

[u] These are the claimed attacks on the Shorthorn Express (June 23), MSC Manazillo (June 26), Waler (June 28), the Ionnis (June 28), Lucky Sailor (July 1), and the Olvia (July 15). Maritime Spotlight data.

[v] These are the claimed attacks on the Destiny (May 15), the Essex (May 23), and the Minerva Antonia (May 29). The Essex, in particular, was quite far away from Israeli waters and docked at an Egyptian gas terminal at the time it was meant to be attacked near Israel. Maritime Spotlight data.

[w] The U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) identified Houthi MRBMs used against Israel to be extended-range variant of the Houthi Burkan-3/Zulfiqar, known in Iran as Qiam/Rezvan. See the declassified dossier “Iran: Enabling Houthi Attacks Across the Middle East,” Defense Intelligence Agency, February 2024.

[x] As many Chinese- and Russian-linked vessels have themselves visited Israeli ports in the past.

[y] In the framework of great power competition, the Axis of Resistance clearly leans toward the non-U.S. bloc, led by China and Russia. In March 2023, Chinese and Russian diplomats reportedly sought Houthi guarantees that their shipping would not be hit in return for ongoing support to the Houthis in the UN Security Council. See Sam Dagher and Mohammed Hatem, “Yemen’s Houthis Tell China, Russia Their Ships Won’t Be Targeted,” Bloomberg, March 21, 2024.

[z] For instance, attacks (all 2024) on ships carrying Russian cargo to China include (but is not limited to): Andromeda Star (April 26); Wind (May 17); Ula Lisbon (June 25); Bentley 1 and Chios Lion (both July 15); Groton (August 30); and Blue Lagoon (September 1).

[aa] Andromeda Star was attacked with multiple ASBMs on April 26, 2024. After the attack, Houthi spokesmen stated (incorrectly) that the vessel was attacked because it had British owners. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ab] The Houthis have undertaken a spate of attacks on shipping in which China has an interest, such as the Pumba, Chinese-owned container vessels attacked on July 20, 2024, with anti-shipping ballistic missiles (ASBMs), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and explosive unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) because the Houthis appear to have consulted outdated materials that showed the vessels as British-owned. After the attack, Houthi spokesmen stated (incorrectly) that the vessel was attacked because it had British owner. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ac] On February 12, 2024, the Star Iris cargo ship was struck by Houthi missiles while transporting corn from Brazil to Iran. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ad] For instance, Cyclades (attacked May 27, 2024) had, 12 days earlier, offloaded its cargo at the Houthi-held port of Salif. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ae] In one case, the Sea Champion, carrying grain from Argentina to the Houthi-held port of Hodeida was attacked by Houthi missiles. Maritime Spotlight data.

[af] Examples include erroneous claims of striking Morea, Sealady, Maersk Hartford, and Alba (all May 29); Happy Condor and Stolt Sequoia (both June 20); and Ionnis (June 28). Maritime Spotlight data.

[ag] The ‘find, fix, and finish’ targeting model refers to identifying a target (find), determining and tracking its precise location (fix), and then employing force or other effects on the target (finish). See “US Army Doctrine Reference Publication No. 3-05: Special Operations,” U.S. Department of the Army, August 31, 2012, pp. 3-11.

[ah] Iranian-supplied VRRs provide geolocation, altitude, and even roll/track angle, heading, speed, nationality, and call signs for aircraft.

[ai] On June 13, 2024, the bulk freighter Verbena was attacked with Houthi anti-ship cruise missiles while being shadowed by an Iranian frigate. Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[aj] The Iranian spy ship Behshad left the Gulf of Aden on April 14, 2024, and has not returned. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ak] By some accounts, an ASBM or other missile arrived at a very shallow trajectory, with minimal warning, without a chance for interception, and splashing down around 200 meters from the Eisenhower. Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request. The Houthis propagandized the carrier’s departure. See “America’s withdrawal from the Red Sea confirms the fall of the myth of Washington’s great power,” Sabant – Saba Agency, May 1, 2024.

[al] For instance: Tavvishi (June 8, hit by single ASBM); Captain Paris (June 16, two within 100m); MSC Sarah V (June 24, first and only shot within 50m); Delonix (June 28, three within 200m); Bentley 1 (July 1, four under 100m ending with a hit); Groton (August 3, four within 50m, including one hit); and Groton again (August 30, two within 100m). Maritime Spotlight data.

[am] ASBMs and cruise missiles are placed together here due to the large number of JMIC and @CENTCOM tweets that simply state “missiles.” Taking contextual factors into account, a high proportion appear to be ASBMs.

[an] Notable Red Sea long-range attacks included Deconix (June 28, five ASBMs), Rostrum (June 11, five ASBMs), and Bentley 1 (July 11, five ASBMs). Maritime Spotlight data.

[ao] Notable Gulf of Aden long-range attacks included Maersk Sentosa (July 7) and Lobivia (July 19, two ASBM hits) Maritime Spotlight data.

[ap] Notable mixed UAV and ASBM attacks included Laax (May 28), AAL Genoa (June 6), and Tavvishi (June 8). Maritime Spotlight data.

[aq] In the case of Cyclades (April 29), the ship was periodically bombarded in the Red Sea over a seven-hour period with a mix of UAVs and ASBMs. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ar] In the case of Transworld Navigator (June 21-23), the ship was pursued from the Gulf of Aden through the central Red Sea, probably being handed off from the Houthi launch areas in Al Bayda to those in Taizz and then to those near Hodeida. In between ASBM attacks, Houthi UAVs attacked the bridge of the vessel.

[as] The “tail-chase” refers to the USV tendency to detect the visual silhouette of a ship from abeam and then begin following it, resulting in a stern attack that tends to hit the propulsion area.

[at] One theory for why Tutor sank (the sinking was not witnessed) is that the vessel was finished off with limpet mines or other demolitions devices or USVs. Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[au] Examples include Seajoy (June 27), Chios Lion (July 15), Pumba (July 20), Delta Blue (August 8), Delta Atlantica (August 12), and Sounion (August 21-22). Maritime Spotlight data.

[av] The key example here is Northwind (August 21). Maritime Spotlight data. As the Houthis have no naval bases in the Gulf of Aden, this suggests either very long-range flotilla patrols that transit the Bab el-Mandab, or flotillas based in the Gulf of Aden or on coastlines in the Horn of Africa.

[aw] This probably included rocket-propelled grenades and heavy machine-guns. Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[ax] This included three successful seizures of vessels by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N) forces and two failed efforts to undertake visit, board, search, and seizure (VBSS) operations against U.S.-linked ships. Maritime Spotlight data.

[ay] Nick Childs of the International Institute for Strategic Studies made a similar point, noting at the very outset of the conflict that “events in the Red Sea have represented the most intense air defence action that any navy has faced probably since the 1982 Falklands War.” Nick Childs, “Red Sea challenges give naval planners more to ponder about future warfare,” IISS, January 31, 2024.

[az] In addition to a strongly rumored near-miss on the USS Eisenhower in June 2024, the USS Gravelly also appears to have had a close call, with an enemy missile eluding two layers of defense and only being intercepted by the ship’s last-line-of-defense Close-In Weapons System. Geoff Ziezulewicz, “A Houthi missile got within a nautical mile of USS Gravely on Tuesday,” Navy Times, February 1, 2024.

[ba] The nine Reapers were lost on November 8, 2023; February 19, 2024; April 25, 2024; May 17, 2024; May 19, 2024; May 29, 2024; August 4, 2024; September 10, 2024; and September 16, 2024; and September 30, 2024. On the most recent incidents, see Jon Gambrell, “US military acknowledges Yemen’s Houthi rebels shot down 2 MQ-9 Reaper drones,” Associated Press, September 17, 2024; and Jon Gambrell, “Yemen’s Houthi rebels claim shooting down another US-made drone as US acknowledges losing one,” Associated Press, September 30, 2024.

[bb] This included numerous strikes on radar, communications, and ground control stations. Maritime Spotlight data.

[bc] Prior to May 2024, there are no reports from UNVIM of vessels bypassing their system. Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused maritime interdiction specialists for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[bd] Very few Houthi missile systems have been struck on the ground, in part because they can be fired from a much wider range of areas due to their short time-in-flight, while drones are limited mostly to the more open coastal plain (as they need to begin their slow flights closer to the sealanes). In mountain launch areas such as Muyakris, Al Bayda, the Houthis have many ideal hiding spots for weapons and searchers have a great deal of ground to cover.

[be] Counter-threat finance teams need to be on the lookout for shippers and insurers seeking to negotiate safe passage through the Red Sea from the Houthis, recognizing that this could become a lucrative source of terrorist threat finance for the Houthi movement.

[bf] In the view of this author, based on numerous conversations with diplomats, investors, and aid workers on the Yemen file in 2024, there is a strong argument to be made that Saudi Arabia now inadvertently enables the Houthis—providing favors (such as reduced scanning of containers headed to Houthi ports) and on-tap political influence to rein in Yemeni government actions such as the anti-Houthi economic warfare in June-July 2024. To shut down the Yemen war, an obstacle to better U.S.-Yemen relations, and to keep the investment climate clear from west coast giga-projects like Neom, the Saudis appear to be yielding to the consolidation of Houthi control in northern Yemen.

[bg] Note the Houthi July 7 threat to strike Saudi infrastructure, with Saudi and United Nations pressure then ending all Yemeni government economic warfare efforts in the 10 days following the threat. See “Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia with attacks on airports, oil installations,” Arab Weekly, July 9, 2024, and (on the collapse of the economic warfare) Robert Worth, “The Houthis’ Dream Come True,” Atlantic, July 14, 2024.

[bh] The Houthis launched three Iran-made Khatif-2 x-wing drones at the Safer oil and gas facility in Marib on August 23, 2024, probably (in the author’s assessment) to impose pressure on the Marib local authorities to share oil products and revenues with the Houthis. See “Houthis attack Safer oil facility in Marib with drones,” Marib (South 24), August 24, 2024.

[bi] The Houthis are reported via some contacts to be present (since the summer of 2024) in the Popular Mobilization Forces Muhandis General Company-owned and Kataib Hezbollah-controlled areas of Muthanna province. Details gathered from interviews with Iraqi intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[bj] Likewise, the Houthis are reported via some contacts to be present (since the summer of 2024) in the Popular Mobilization Forces Muhandis General Company-owned and Kataib Hezbollah-controlled areas of western Anbar province, notably the Trebil free trade zone. Details gathered from interviews with Iraqi intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[bk] The DIA assessed at least one of the launched missiles to have been an extended-range variant of the Quds, known in Iran as Project 351/Paveh. “Iran: Enabling Houthi Attacks Across the Middle East.”

[bl] U.S. envoy to Yemen Tim Lenderking noted on September 18, 2024: “They [the Houthis] are also partnering across ideological lines with terrorist groups like al-Shabaab in Somalia.” Quoted in “A Conversation With H.E. Mohammed A. Al-Hadhrami and Timothy A. Lenderking,” Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, September 18, 2024.

[bm] Iran has used Iraqis to crack down on internal dissent. The Assad regime has used Lebanese, Afghan, Pakistani, and Iraqi personnel to crack down on its people in places like Aleppo. News reporting of Houthi foot soldiers being deployed to Syria might be a leading indicator of impoverished Yemeni recruits being used overseas to bolster axis member regime security. For an example of the phenomenon, see “Iran Brings in Iraqi Popular Mobilization Militias to Suppress Ahvaz Revolution,” MENA Research Center, July 27, 2021, and “Iran Reportedly Brings Iraqi Allies To Crack Down On Protests,” Iran International, November 1, 2022. For recent claims of Houthi deployments to Syria, see “The Houthis in Yemen threaten Israel with ground attacks,” Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, September 13, 2024.

Citations
[1] Barak Salmoni, Bryce Loidolt, and Madeleine Wells, Regime and Periphery in Northern Yemen: The Houthi Phenomenon (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010), p. 189.

[2] For a recent explainer on the axis, see Kian Sharifi, “Iran’s ‘Axis Of Resistance’: Different Groups, Same Goals,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, February 19, 2024.

[3] Author’s geolocated incident dataset of the post-October 7 war. These comprised attacks (all in 2023) on October 31; and November 9 and 25.

[4] The Washington Institute’s Maritime Spotlight platform is available at https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/series/maritime-spotlight. All the maritime attack case studies in this article draw upon the very useful Washington Institute online tracker by Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi.

[5] For example, see Anika Seth, “Israel says Hamas top military commander killed; Hamas political leader mourned in Iran,” Washington Post, August 1, 2024.

[6] For example, see Susannah George and Mohamad El Chamaa, “Israeli strike on Iranian Consulate in Damascus kills key commander, Iran says,” Washington Post, April 1, 2024.

[7] Dan De Luce, “CIA director: Iranian attack on Israel was a ‘spectacular failure,’” NBC News, April 18, 2024.

[8] For example, see Mark Cancian, “How Israel degraded Hezbollah for years to come, in 8 days,” Breaking Defense, September 24, 2024.

[9] George Wright and Mallory Moench, “Israel launches ground invasion in Lebanon,” BBC, October 1, 2024.

[10] Michael Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023,” CTC Sentinel 17:4 (2024).

[11] Ibid.

[12] Michael Knights, “The Houthi War Machine: From Guerrilla War to State Capture,” CTC Sentinel 11:8 (2018).

[13] Michael Knights, Adnan Jabrani, and Casey Coombs, “The Houthi Jihad Council: Command and Control in ‘the Other Hizballah,’” CTC Sentinel 15:10 (2022).

[14] Ibid.

[15] See Maritime Spotlight: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/series/maritime-spotlight

[16] A means to cross-check the Maritime Spotlight data is the online dataset of the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC), run by the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).

[17] Knights, Jabrani, and Coombs, “The Houthi Jihad Council.”

[18] See “Operational Tempo” section.

[19] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[20] Ibid.

[21] See “Balance Sheet” section.

[22] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[23] See the definitions of “attacks” (major, minor, attempted) in the JMIC Weekly Dashboard at https://cd.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/ukmto/products/jmic-weekly-dashboard—week-37-2024.pdf?rev=a5bb940b27374cc5a0d76384257f46a9

[24] All the maritime attack case studies in this article draw upon the very useful Washington Institute Maritime Spotlight online tracker by Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi.

[25] Gathered by collating all USCENTCOM X updates on interceptions, which appears to be exhaustive, due to the ease of collecting this data and the strong incentive for U.S. forces to report such successes.

[26] Author’s security incident dataset.

[27] Author’s security incident dataset.

[28] Soraya Ebrahimi, “Yemen’s Houthis threaten to extend ship attacks to Indian Ocean,” National, March 14, 2024.

[29] Maritime Spotlight data.

[30] Author interview, Noam Raydan, September 2024.

[31] See Michael Knights, Amir al-Kaabi, and Hamdi Malik, “Tracking Anti-U.S. and Anti-Israel Strikes From Iraq and Syria During the Gaza Crisis,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, August 5, 2024.

[32] For a good explainer on burgeoning Houthi diplomatic and military ties to Iraq, see “‘Martyrdom’ of senior commander in Iraq highlights Houthi presence in region,” Amwaj, August 7, 2024. For the same regarding Syria, see Haid Haid, “Houthis in Syria: Genuine threat or political posturing?” Al Majalla, September 26, 2024.

[33] Hamdi Malik and Michael Knights, “Profile: The Islamic Resistance in Iraq,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, October 21, 2023.

[34] Hamdi Malik and Michael Knights, “Iraqi Groups and Yemen’s Houthis Claim More Joint Attacks on Israel,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, June 17, 2024.

[35] Malik and Knights, “Profile: The Islamic Resistance in Iraq.”

[36] Knights, al-Kaabi, and Malik.

[37] Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi, “Assessing the Latest Houthi Maritime Threats,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, May 16, 2024.

[38] Knights, al-Kaabi, and Malik.

[39] Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi, “Are the Houthis Attacking Ships in the Mediterranean?” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, July 3, 2024.

[40] Michael Knights and Ameer al-Kaabi, “Houthi Missile Forces Colonel Killed at Iraqi Government Base in Jurf al-Sakhar,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, August 6, 2024.

[41] Drawn from the author’s dataset of Houthi MRBM strikes on Israel, collated from open-source news alerts.

[42] “Israel military says it intercepts missile, Yemen’s Houthi rebels confirm targeting Eilat,” France 24, July 21, 2024.

[43] “Houthi missile reaches central Israel for first time, no injuries reported,” Reuters, September 15, 2024; Justin Salhani, “Yemen’s Houthis fire ‘hypersonic’ missile at Israel: What to know,” Reuters, September 7, 2024.

[44] “Houthi missile reaches central Israel for first time, no injuries reported.”

[45] Drawn from the author’s dataset of Houthi MRBM strikes on Israel, collated from open-source news alerts.

[46] Salhani.

[47] Emanuel Fabian, “Houthi missile remains land near Jerusalem, causing slight damage,” Times of Israel, September 28, 2024.

[48] Author’s security incident dataset.

[49] “The Houthi Strike on Tel Aviv: A Non-Escalatory Escalation,” Sanaa Center, July 26, 2024.

[50] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[51] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[52] Emanuel Fabian, “In first, IDF confirms Houthi cruise missile hit open area near Eilat on Monday,” Times of Israel, March 19, 2024.

[53] Details gathered from interviews with Israeli Defense Force officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[54] “Summary of Operation ‘Outstretched Arm,’” Israel Defense Forces, July 21, 2024.

[55] Emanuel Fabian, “Dozens of Israeli planes strike port, power plants in Yemen after Houthi missile attacks,” Times of Israel, September 29, 2024.

[56] Michael Knights, “To Stop Israeli Attacks on Yemen, Enforce Sanctions on the Iran-Houthi Link,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, July 22, 2024.

[57] “Israel shoots down missile fired from Yemen after striking Houthis,” Reuters, July 21, 2024.

[58] “Houthi chief vows to intensify attacks on Israel, says airstrikes won’t deter them,” Times of Israel, July 21, 2024.

[59] Ibid.

[60] “Israel army launches air raids on Yemen’s Ras Isa and Hodeidah,” Al Jazeera, September 29, 2024.

[61] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused industry analysts for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[62] Lloyd’s List Intelligence.

[63] Lloyd’s List Intelligence.

[64] Lloyd’s List Intelligence.

[65] Author’s security incident dataset.

[66] Author’s security incident dataset.

[67] Mohammed Alghobari, “Yemen’s Houthis leader says group will target Israeli ships in Red Sea,” Reuters, November 14, 2023.

[68] “Yemen’s Houthis declare readiness to confront strikes from Israel,” Middle East Monitor, December 13, 2023.

[69] Patrick Wintour, “Houthis show resolve that western strikes will be hard pushed to shake,” Guardian, January 12, 2024.

[70] Clauda Tanios and Ahmed Tolba, “Yemen’s Houthis chief says group will target any ships related to transport of goods to Israel,” Reuters, May 9, 2024.

[71] Author interview, Noam Raydan, September 2024.

[72] Ibid.

[73] Ibid.

[74] “Red Sea chokepoints are critical for international oil and natural gas flows,” U.S. Energy Information Administration, December 4, 2023.

[75] Noam Raydan, “Even After Houthi Attacks, Russia-Linked Tankers Return to Red Sea,” Maritime Spotlight, August 22, 2024.

[76] Author interview, Noam Raydan, September 2024.

[77] Details gathered from interviews with oil trading contacts for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[78] See the JMIC Weekly Dashboard at https://cd.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/ukmto/products/jmic-weekly-dashboard—week-37-2024.pdf?rev=a5bb940b27374cc5a0d76384257f46a9. The incident-by-incident tracker produced by Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi is also exceptionally useful for its analysis of ship ownership data to note recent changes in ship ownership that the Houthis appear to have missed—with Israeli-, U.S.- and U.K.-linked ships that may have been brought by Chinese owners.

[79] See the JMIC Weekly Dashboard at https://cd.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/ukmto/products/jmic-weekly-dashboard—week-37-2024.pdf?rev=a5bb940b27374cc5a0d76384257f46a9

[80] Maritime Spotlight data.

[81] Maritime Spotlight data.

[82] For a backgrounder on AIS, see “Automatic Identification System (AIS) Overview,” United States Coast Guard, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, n.d.

[83] Ibid.

[84] The time-in-flight aspects of Houthi anti-shipping weapons are described in Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[85] See the JMIC Weekly Dashboard from June 14, 2024, at https://cd.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/ukmto/weekly-incident-report-pdf-files/indian-ocean/2024/jun/20240614_ukmto_summary_report-14jun24.pdf?rev=8772bc04fd3a4facab77de288bdbb30b

[86] See the JMIC Weekly Dashboard at https://cd.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/ukmto/products/jmic-weekly-dashboard—week-37-2024.pdf?rev=a5bb940b27374cc5a0d76384257f46a9

[87] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[88] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[89] Ibid.

[90] Data about a ship’s direction of travel and distance from a cell tower might be discernable based on cellphone data being used aboard ships in the narrow Bab el-Mandab, where the Yemeni shore is generally within sight during transits.

[91] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[92] Farzin Nadimi and Michael Knights, “Iran’s Support to Houthi Air Defenses in Yemen,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, April 4, 2018.

[93] Ibid.

[94] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[95] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[96] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[97] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[98] The time-in-flight aspects of Houthi anti-shipping weapons are described in Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[99] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[100] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[101] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[102] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[103] Ibid.

[104] Author’s security incident dataset.

[105] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[106] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[107] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[108] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[109] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[110] Maritime Spotlight data.

[111] Maritime Spotlight data.

[112] Maritime Spotlight data.

[113] Maritime Spotlight data.

[114] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[115] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[116] Quoted in Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[117] Ibid.

[118] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[119] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[120] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[121] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[122] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study.

[123] “Statement from Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III on Ensuring Freedom of Navigation in the Red Sea,” U.S. Department of Defense, December 18, 2023.

[124] “EUNAVFOC Operation Aspides Fact Sheet,” European External Action Service, February 19, 2024.

[125] George N. Tzogopoulos, “Operation Poseidon Archer,” Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, April 10, 2024.

[126] Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh Holds a Press Briefing, September 27, 2024. The US Department of Defense said the attack included cruise missiles and drones, which were intercepted by three US warships: USS Stockdale, USS Spruance and USS Indianapolis.

[127] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[128] Author interview, Noam Raydan, September 2024.

[129] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[130] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused U.S. and U.K. intelligence officers for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[131] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused maritime interdiction specialists for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[132] “Joint Statement: Barbara Woodward (United Kingdom) on the humanitarian situation in Yemen – Security Council Media Stakeout,” United Nations, June 13, 2024.

[133] For a fact sheet in this, see “Jurisdiction Over Vessels,” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, last updated October 4, 2022.

[134] Knights, “Assessing the Houthi War Effort Since October 2023.”

[135] Details gathered from interviews with Yemeni contacts for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[136] Details gathered from interviews with Yemeni contacts for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request. In the open source, Yemeni media reported on the Sanaa-Beirut-Sanaa flight on July 26-27, 2024. See “A dangerous development. Secret flight of a Yemenia plane from Sanaa airport to the Lebanese capital Beirut revealed,” Al-Mashad Media, July 27, 2024.

[137] See “Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia with attacks on airports, oil installations,” Arab Weekly, July 9, 2024, and (on the collapse of the economic warfare) Robert Worth, “The Houthis’ Dream Come True,” Atlantic, July 14, 2024. See also “The Economy,” Yemen Review, Saanaa Center for Strategic Studies, April-June 2024.

[138] See Ibid. See also the U.N. announcement on the suspension of economic warfare: “Statement by the Office of the UN Special Envoy for Yemen,” Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Yemen, July 23, 2024.

[139] Author’s interview, senior U.S. naval officer, mid-2024. Name of interviewee, and date and place of interview withheld at interviewee’s request.

[140] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused maritime interdiction specialists for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[141] Author’s interview, senior U.K. naval officer, mid-2024. Name of interviewee, and date and place of interview withheld at interviewees’ request.

[142] Raydan.

[143] Details gathered from interviews with Yemen-focused industry analysts for this study. Names of interviewees, and dates and places of interviews withheld at interviewees’ request.

[144] These are all the author’s assessments, based on the author’s security incident dataset.

[145] “What is the Potential of the Houthi Threat from Syrian Territory on Israel?” Alma Research, September 15, 2024.

[146] Adnan Jabarni, A New Axis: Strategic Coordination between the Houthis and Iraqi Factions, Sanaa Center For Strategic Studies, July 15, 2024. See also “Hamas, Houthis Open Offices in Iraq,” Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, September 17, 2024.

[147] For a starter history, see “German Surface Raiders,” Naval History and Heritage Command, June 1, 2022. For an engaging read on the possible contemporary return of the merchant raider, see Chuck Hill, “Return of the Clandestine Merchant Raider?” CIMSEC, August 13, 2015.

[148] Quoted in “A Conversation With H.E. Mohammed A. Al-Hadhrami and Timothy A. Lenderking,” Arab Gulf States Institute, September 18, 2024. Also quoted in Hadley Gamble, “Days from disaster: Red Sea oil spill would dwarf Exxon Valdez, Lenderking says,” Al Arabiya News, September 9, 2024.

[149] “Russia in weapon transfer talks with Yemen’s Huthis: US envoy to AFP,” AFP, September 26, 2024. Reuters separately reported the story: John Irish, Parisa Hafezi, and Jonathan Landay, “Iran brokering talks to send advanced Russian missiles to Yemen’s Houthis, sources say,” Reuters, September 24, 2024.

[150] Bassem Mroue and Melanie Lidman, “Hezbollah confirms its leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed in an Israeli airstrike,” Associated Press, September 28, 2024.

[151] “Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing Posture of United States Central Command and United States Africa Command in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2025 and The Future Years,” U.S. Central Command, March 8, 2024.

[152] Israeli politician Naftali Bennett coined the phrase. See “Bennett to NYT: Israel ‘foolish’ to engage with Iran’s proxies rather than addressing root cause of the threat,” Times of Israel, August 24, 2024. Bennett is quoted as saying: “The head of the octopus is much weaker, much more vulnerable and feeble, than its arms. So how foolish are we to engage in war with the arms when we could engage with the head?”